If you’re one of the many people who’s dedicated more
than a few statuses, tweets or Instagram posts to the Paris terrorist attacks,
there’s a good chance you’re not the authority on the issue you seem to be or
quite the humanitarian you claim to be. In what's proven to be a shocking few days
in world events across a number of countries, it’s hard to say if people
have taken the time to learn any more from these incidents than the order of
the French tricolour… if that. In
reality, we’ve perhaps learned more from people’s reaction to these events,
than we have from the events themselves.
So what have we learned? Well we’ve learned that while our hearts may
very well be in the right place, at times our minds are definitely not. The Paris attacks revealed an incredible
naivety, Eurocentrism and lack of commitment on our parts that we have sadly seen time and
time again. We’ve learned this in the
same way that we learned most of us are really only interested in addressing human
rights violations in Africa when it involves us sharing a ‘Kony 2012’ profile
picture. We’ve learned this in the same
way that we learned most of us will only really show an interest in supporting
medical research when it involves posting a video of us completing a challenge on
social media that might help get more than the ten likes we normally
average on a post. Now, sadly we’ve
learned this as we’ve seen a vast majority of people only show a willingness to
make vocal appeals for humanity and compassion on social media when tragedy
strikes popular Contiki destinations or places they once visited and posted a
photo in. Our compassion
towards, consideration of and commitment to a cause should not
and must not be determined by our vested interest in it, but it seems that it is.
The flag being flown all over the world at the moment. |
Compassion is something you either possess or you don’t and
you can’t turn it on and off whenever you feel like it. Therefore, it should be concerning to us all
that we only seem willing to show support for particular causes when it seems
like that’s what everyone else is doing. If we latched onto causes as firmly as we latched onto hashtags, we
could really begin to get “#HelpForEveryone” rather than just “#PrayForParis.” So I’m going to do something everyone should
be doing with relation to this issue and that’s leaving religion out of
it. It’s a factor in the issue of
the attacks but it’s almost irrelevant when it comes to how we deal with this
issue. What we need to start addressing
is the hypocrisy and the double standards we seem to be demonstrating and the
fact that we in the west (and this includes western Europe) appear to value our lives more than some
others.
The world reacts... though often too late. |
We demonstrate this when we allow media and ourselves to brush
over the U.S bombing of numerous civilian targets, most recently a hospital in
Afghanistan, but we devote almost 24-hour coverage to a terrorist attack in
Paris. That’s why we have these
problems, because a vast majority of us only engage in selective
compassion. I’m extremely angry with
many western governments and their foreign policies, in particular the E.U and
the U.S. I’m not a Muslim and I’m not
angry because I’m an Orthodox Christian.
My disdain and anger has nothing whatsoever to do with my religion. I say this to reiterate that my frustration
and disappointment stems from the fact that these same world powers repeatedly
get away with murder and destruction because they package it up as something
much nicer and more honourable than it is, where they attempt to convince us that their ends always justify their means. What's most saddening though is that many people believe them and in fact fail to see that these are foreign policies that breed contempt and violence, where their means always seem to lead to innocent people falling victim in the end.
We need to realise that part of showing compassion now is
remembering when we should have shown the same compassion before. Remembering that in 1999, almost 4000 people (many of whom were children) were
killed in the 78 day bombing campaign of Serbia. 16 employees working late in a TV station
were killed when NATO forces bombed the RTS building in Belgrade. There was no international condemnation in
response to this, no recognition of this as an act of terror and no candlelight vigils in international capitals. In Beslan, Russia less than 10 years ago,
385 people were killed in a terrorist attack on a school. 186 of those killed were children. Profile pictures weren’t changed to Russian
flags and the world didn’t stop to remember.
On the same night of the Paris attack, a terrorist attack in the
Lebanese capital of Beirut killed 44 people and barely warranted a mention in
the mainstream media. The same can be said for U.S-led air strikes in Syria, which alone have claimed over 450 civilian lives. I mention all of these because we need to realise
that the more selective we become about the violence we chose to mourn, the
more random the violence becomes.
Egypt projects Lebanese, Russian and French flags on the pyramids of Giza as a mark of respect for the victims of terror attacks in the respective countries. |
The core of the problem is that the west convinces us that
the bombs we drop overseas are good, yet only an attack on us is classified as an 'act of terror.' It’s hypocrisy that calls civilian deaths in
NATO bombing campaigns “collateral damage” but western deaths in Paris “an
international tragedy.” It serves to
convince us that it’s okay for us not to bat an eyelid when Charlie Hebdo makes
fun of Russian air-crash victims, or Serbian civilian casualties, but we must
condemn anyone attempting to make light of an attack against us. And worst of all, even if most people don’t
want to admit it, we appear to value our lives more than those of people living in some other parts of the world.
The concept of mocking victims is less appealing when you become the victims. |
Maybe it’s because most people haven’t been backpacking
through Beslan. They haven’t visited the
markets of Beirut. They haven’t spent
their honeymoon in Belgrade. None of
these cities have been branded ‘The City of Love.’ Whatever the case may be, my point is this; it doesn’t devalue the lives
of the people living within them. It’s
wonderful that you've taken the time to change your profile picture, that you've pleaded for others to say a prayer and then you've gone to sleep feeling like you’ve done something to
make the world a slightly better place.
I guess I’d just like to see a world where people try a little bit
harder to do something good, rather than trying so damned hard to make it look
like they’re doing something good. A world where people are hopefully informed enough to know at least that I've put the French tricolour in the wrong order after the second paragraph. Because it’s
no good to keep saying we support people in times of crisis if we only lend our support to certain people in time of crisis and if we do nothing to
combat the causes of the crisis.
So thankyou for changing your profile pictures and sharing
your posts. My question is, where
was this concern earlier and more importantly, where will it be in a week’s
time?
** For more info, updates and photos, follow me on Twitter & Instagram **
** For more info, updates and photos, follow me on Twitter & Instagram **
Where will it be in a weeks time? Sadly the most likely answer is The Kardashians :(
ReplyDeleteThanks Stefan, your article says just what I was thinking, well said.
#prayfrotheworld.
Best way to play the Slots casino games for real money 2021
ReplyDeleteIf you want to test out the slot game and try out some of the best games 카지노사이트 you can find on the top of the list, then you'd definitely look into casinosites it.